When justice surrenders: The effect of just-world beliefs on aggression following ostracism

نویسندگان

  • Kai-Tak Poon
  • Zhansheng Chen
چکیده

• General just-world beliefs (GJWB) influence aggression after ostracism. • Ostracized people with weak GJWB behave more aggressively. • Perceived deservingness mediates the effect of GJWB onaggression after ostracism. a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o The present research examined the influence of general just-world beliefs on aggression following ostracism. The findings provided converging support for the hypothesis that people with weak general just-world beliefs, either measured (Studies 1 and 4) or primed (Studies 2 and 3), would behave more aggressively following ostracism than people with strong general just-world beliefs. Furthermore, perceived deservingness (Study 3) or attribu-tion (Study 4) mediated the relationship between general just-world beliefs and aggression following ostracism. These findings highlight the significance of general just-world beliefs in understanding the coping responses to negative interpersonal experiences. The implications are discussed. Introduction People have a fundamental need to maintain positive and sustainable social relationships (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). Ostracism 1 , which refers to being excluded and rejected, thwarts such a fundamental need for belonging (see Williams, 2007, 2009 for reviews). The literature has uncovered various detrimental consequences of ostracism. In particular, ostracism-related forms of relational devaluations can lead to started to examine how motivational and situational factors interact with ostracism to predict aggression However, few studies have examined how beliefs, which are central to the way in which people package their experiences (Dweck, 2008), moderate the effect of ostracism on aggression. Given that beliefs are closely linked to behaviors (e.g., Ajzen, 1991; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975), it is reasonable to expect that one's beliefs may help us understand when and why ostracism increases aggressive behavior. In particular, we focused on general just-world beliefs, which are the beliefs that we live in a just world where people deserve what they get and get what they deserve We examined whether general just-world beliefs would moderate the effect of ostracism on aggressive behavior. Strong general just-world beliefs not only help people cope with stressful situations (Tomaka & Blascovich, 1994), but also inhibit antisocial urges in situations that involve conflicts (Nesbit, Blankenship, & Murray, 2012). Therefore, we predicted that strong general just-world beliefs would weaken the effect of ostracism on aggression. Furthermore , we explored a mechanism for the relationship between just-world beliefs and aggression following ostracism. People with strong just-world beliefs, but not people with weak just-world beliefs, tend …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism

a r t i c l e i n f o The current research investigates the role of implicit theories of relationships in modulating aggressive responses to ostracism. Three studies tested whether destiny beliefs (that potential relationships are either fundamentally compatible or not) predispose people to behave aggressively in the wake of ostracism. In Study 1, individual differences in destiny beliefs moder...

متن کامل

رابطه پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت با باور به دنیای عادلانه و ناعادلانه و باورهای جبران عدالت

This research was administered with the aim of investigating the relationship between big five personality factors and belief in an unjust and just world, and beliefs of justice compensation among male students. Research statistical population was the male students of high school, among them 196 persons were selected using simple random sampling. Research instrument were big five personality fa...

متن کامل

Victim blaming and exoneration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: the role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism.

The existence of domestic violence is closely linked to several ideological factors that include sexism and other beliefs about society in general, namely the belief in a just world. In this study, which involved 485 people of both sexes aged between 18 and 70 years, we analyzed the influence of these ideological variables of the perceivers and characteristics of the situation on judgments of a...

متن کامل

We blame innocent victims more than I do: self-construal level moderates responses to just-world threats.

This study investigated the impact of self-construal levels on people's tendency to blame innocent victims for the victims' fates. The authors hypothesized that when the belief in a just world is threatened, social self-construal is associated with more victim blaming than individual self-construal is. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were primed with either the individual self (with the wo...

متن کامل

Running head: ANTECEDENTS OF JUSTICE EXPECTATIONS

Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to investigate the influence of applicants‟ justice beliefs (i.e., belief in a just world and belief in tests) on justice expectations with respect to a forthcoming application for the job of prison guard. Further, the moderating role of direct experiences on the relationship between beliefs and justice expectations was studied. Design/methodology/approac...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015